Submit your application

Ukrainian Supreme Court prevented the bank from recovering the shortage from the cash collector

On October 23, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ukraine in case No. 522/6582/16-c published a legal conclusion regarding the wrongness of the bank, which was collecting funds to pay off the loan debt under a non-existent loan agreement.

Details of the proceedings

A citizen-former employee of the bank went to court with a claim against the bank to recover the funds received without reason by the latter. The motivated statement of claim was as follows:

  • the plaintiff worked in the bank as a driver-security guard-collector;
  • there was a shortage of funds in one of the branches;
  • the bank “hung up” this shortage on the plaintiff and began to write off from his salary account;
  • the write-off was carried out on base as “repayment of debt under a loan agreement”;
  • since the plaintiff did not enter into a loan agreement with the bank, he considers that the write-off was unreasonable;
  • therefore, the money must be returned, since it is his salary.

The plaintiff stated in court that he was not guilty of the loss of the safe package, therefore the money from him, as compensation for damage, was illegally debited!

The court of first instance dismissed the claim, pointing out to the plaintiff the existence of an employment relationship between him and the bank, in particular, enshrined in an agreement on full liability, which “allowed” the bank to enforce the recovery from the employee. The appeal court agreed with this!

“The cassation instance“ represented by the Supreme Court decided the issue in a different way! The circumstances of the incident were investigated in more detail and the fact of the absence of a loan agreement was objectively assessed as a basis for writing off funds from the plaintiff.”

The following was found out:

  1. The transportation of money, in which the plaintiff participated, was carried out collectively, which makes it impossible to establish the individual responsibility of each of the driver-collectors.
  2. Clause one logically assumes that the controversial funds could be recovered on the basis of an agreement on collective (brigade) material liability.
  3. The specified agreement is absent in the case materials, therefore, the decisions of the courts of the previous instances to recover the bank’s losses are based on the lack of proof of the plaintiff’s guilt.
  4. The official investigation in the bank ended with the fact that “the shortage was probably the fault of the drivers,” and the final decision had to be made after the conclusions of the polygraph.
  5. The plaintiff was dismissed from his post due to a loss of confidence, but before this happened, money was written off from his salary to pay off non-existent credit debt.

These circumstances “speak” that the funds were written off illegally, since there is no loan agreement, therefore, the loan was not provided and the plaintiff’s obligation to pay for it simply does not exist in nature!



SCU on the validity of the contract after the replacement of the 1st page in it

The impossibility of establishing certain circumstances does not relieve the participants in the process from the need to prove them! This conclusion was made public by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25.09.19 following the results of the proceedings in case No. 397/928/16-c. The reason for the dispute was the replacement of the first page […]

Is it legal to sublet land bypassing the lessor?

Is the transfer of leased land to sublease without the consent of the owner legal? If so, in what cases? If not, when? What does the law tell us about this and how are litigations resolved between the parties to such legal relations, which, due to ignorance of regulatory rules, violate the law? Thus, lease-contractual […]

Nuances of collecting foreign debts: preventive measures and practical aspects

The international market for business is an opportunity to earn more, but with a higher risk of losses. Losses are most often associated with non-fulfillment by counterparties of their obligations and with the legalization of court decisions on the territories of foreign states. In particular, with non-payments, that is, with debts, the return of which […]

Civil marriage: showdown because of the apartment bought in it

Family showdown is an eternal topic! Even the array of family legislation and court practice accumulated over decades does not contain answers to all questions regarding family relations! The Supreme Court once again had to figure out whether or not the testimonies of witnesses certified by a notary are considered legal confirmation of a civil […]

There is nothing to recover from the legal entity-debtor? Bringing controlling persons to subsidiary liability!

Reminder! The material is devoted to the collection of debts from foreign legal entities, namely, from debtors – residents of the Russian Federation. Need to act according to the principle “in war, all means are good”, namely, using all possible tools for recovery. We have already considered “encashment settlement accounts of debtors” and “cooperation with […]

Aspects of calculating court fees when collecting a mortgage

“On claims for foreclosure on the subject of a mortgage, the court fee is calculated based on the value of the pledged property, and not on the amount of the debt obligation!” – expressed the Supreme Court of Ukraine by the decision on the case No. 307/23/18 dated 02.10.19. The conclusion was made after considering […]