En
Submit your application

Ukrainian Supreme Court on the loss of the right to use housing due to non-residence

By its decision in case No. 465/7083/13-c of 10.07.19, the Supreme Court of Ukraine provided a kind of housing legal advice, answering the question whether the fact that minors did not living in an apartment in itself was an unconditional justification for their loss of the right to use the living space.

The question arose in the course of the proceedings on the claim of a person who asked in court to recognize the fact of the loss of the use of the apartment by another person who has minor children and has lived with them for a long time at a different address.

The claim was motivated by the fact that the defendant has not lived in the apartment since 2003, does not use housing and does not pay the rent!

The defendant did not agree with this and demanded to move into the apartment through the court in a counterclaim.

The court of first instance satisfied the plaintiff’s claim to recognize the defendant and the children as having lost their right of residence. The counterclaim was partially satisfied, one of the children was moved into the apartment.

The court, satisfying the claim for the cancellation of the right to use, proceeded from the fact that the defendant did not live in the apartment for a long time, took his things from there, and did not participate in the maintenance of the housing. The appeal upheld the said decision.

“It was said that the defendant left the house voluntarily and does not live in it. She has the keys to him and can go there at will, which is wrong, since Art. 71 and 72 HCU it is determined that a person loses the right to use a dwelling if he is absent from it without good reason for more than 6 months ”.

The case went to the Supreme Court of Ukraine, which did not agree with the opinion of the courts of previous instances. The circumstances of the dispute were analyzed anew.

It turned out the following:

  1. All participants in the proceedings are registered in the disputed communal apartment.
  2. The defendant does not live there for a long time, although she is registered.
  3. At the time of the examination of the apartment, the defendant was present there and sometimes comes there.

HC URSR (part 1 of article 71, article 72) states that in the event of a temporary absence of the employer (members of his family), they retain their living space for a six-month period. Recognition of a person as having lost the right to use the dwelling due to absence over the specified period is carried out in court.

This rule “works” when it comes to adult capable citizens, but it is not unconditional if these citizens have minor children from 10 to 14 years old, whom the law protects by determining that their place of residence is the place of residence of their parents.

Consequently, “such eviction through the courts” is carried out by agreement of the guardianship authorities and with “relocation” to other housing.

26.11.2019

8

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
One aspect of resolving disputes over land use rights

Disputed land under the construction is a potential litigation with all the ensuing consequences. The Supreme Court of Ukraine considered one of such disputes and published a legal opinion, which determines that the granting of permission for the development of a land management project regarding the allotment of a “non-free” land plot does not give […]

The nuances of transactions made by persons who are not aware of their actions

“All transactions carried out by persons who, at the time of their commission, did not fully realize their actions, are subject to invalidation, but their recognition in court as such should be carried out after a full study of the proceedings!” – This conclusion was made by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on September 18, […]

A decent pension is not an obstacle to claiming alimony

The duty of children to support their parents who need help is established by law! If the children do not fulfill it voluntarily, then the parents have the right to demand alimony through the court, and such family cases are always difficult, the court practice on them is constantly changing and supplemented, and it is […]

Had delayed paying severance pay? Pay the fine!

The first thing every citizen leaving his old place of work thinks about is how much money will fall on the card as a severance pay. Naturally, he wants more and that’s okay! The employer who signs the dismissal order is thinking about how to pay less! And he can be understood too! But, the […]

On “saving” confiscated housing by donating it to relatives

One of the “working” options for “saving” real estate from confiscation / foreclosure to pay off debts, the people have always considered the option of donating it to relatives through drawing up a donation agreement, the fictitiousness of which is quite difficult to dispute. Difficult, but possible! The Supreme Court of Ukraine published another legal […]

Judge goes to vacation – robbers set free!

The main “hero” of this material was a judge who went on vacation without settling all his current affairs, for which he was punished. In the opinion of the disciplinary body, which applied the sanctions initiated by the prosecutor’s office, the issue that the judge had to decide was not complicated and there were no […]

lacomics.org