Submit your application

The Supreme Court of Ukraine on the cancellation of the “old” will with a new one

The citizen applied to the court with a claim against two other persons, demanding the recognition of property rights by inheritance. The claim was motivated by the fact that after the death of her aunt, an inheritance for real estate (house, land) was opened.

She, within the time period established by law, turned to the notary with a statement on the acceptance of the inheritance. The notary refused to issue a certificate of ownership, citing the presence of an heir by will.

This happened because the plaintiff’s aunt made two wills in one day: the first at 11:00, and the second at 15:30. Before lunch, she bequeathed all her property to one person, and after lunch, she left only the land share to the same person.

According to the opinion of the plaintiff stated in the court, this heir has the right to claim only a land share, and all remaining property (a residential building and 2 land plots) must be divided between the heirs according to the law …

The plaintiff asked the court to recognize her ownership of the house with outbuildings and two land plots, since the wills contradict one another, determining a different volume of inherited property.

The court of first instance and appeal to the plaintiff were denied. Motivated by the fact that wills are not contradictory, because they were drawn up by one person and with respect to one heir. It was decided that the last will does not cancel the previous one, but only clarifies it in terms of the land plot.

SCU figured out the situation

Having considered the case No. 369/3186/17 on June 26, 1919, by its resolution he published a legal opinion stating that the fact of drawing up a new will, which reducing the amount of the estate, but does not change the testator, cancels the “old” will.

It was established that the plaintiff is the niece of the deceased and applied for the inheritance as the heir under the law by the right of representation. At the same time, the person to whom the deceased with two wills left her property (the heir under the will), as well as another person, declared her rights. In addition, there was one more “older” will in the case concerning two other persons.

This further “confused” the situation, which the Supreme Court of Ukraine “unraveled”!

The Ukrainian Supreme Court pointed out the fact that in this situation, Part 3 of Art. 1254 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which states that a decrease in the volume of the hereditary mass, even without changing the testator, cancels the will of the latter in the relevant part, since he decided so.

Based on this, the Armed Forces of Ukraine awarded the heir under the will only the land share (according to the “afternoon” will). With regard to the rest of the property, the Armed Forces of Ukraine clarified that it must be inherited on the basis of the law, as part of the estate not covered by the will.



There is nothing to recover from the legal entity-debtor? Bringing controlling persons to subsidiary liability!

Reminder! The material is devoted to the collection of debts from foreign legal entities, namely, from debtors – residents of the Russian Federation. Need to act according to the principle “in war, all means are good”, namely, using all possible tools for recovery. We have already considered “encashment settlement accounts of debtors” and “cooperation with […]

The Supreme Court of Ukraine approved the binding nature of the treaty! Conclusion on case No. 456/2946/17

Initially! The legal entity filed a lawsuit against the individual in court, demanding the fulfillment of the obligation under the terms of the preliminary tripartite agreement with the transfer of advance payments for the further purchase of the apartment by the defendant. The claims were motivated by the fact that the applicant fulfilled his obligations […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine on the interpretation of treaties on the basis of contra proferentem

The Ukrainian Supreme Court “remembered” about the “contra proferentem” principle! By the decision in case No. 756/1381/17-c of 03/25/2020, he consolidated the legal conclusion based on this doctrine. It reads: “If the interpretation of the content of a written agreement by means of general methods is impossible, the contra proferentem interpretation is used – the […]

Had delayed paying severance pay? Pay the fine!

The first thing every citizen leaving his old place of work thinks about is how much money will fall on the card as a severance pay. Naturally, he wants more and that’s okay! The employer who signs the dismissal order is thinking about how to pay less! And he can be understood too! But, the […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine on the disclosure of classified materials in criminal cases

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine considered the criminal case No. 751/7557/15-k and on January 16, 2019 published a resolution that regulated the application the Art. 290th Criminal Code. It is important that the Supreme Court decided not to deviate from the existing legal conclusion regulating the procedural aspects of opening materials […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine on the recovery of unreasonably acquired property

The risks of investing in construction in Ukraine are obvious, nevertheless, they still continue to invest in this industry, because the demand for housing in our country remains steadily high. When investing, the contribution “grows” along with the construction, the closer the date of its commissioning, the more expensive it becomes. At the same time, […]