En
Submit your application

The plaintiff threatened the judge for not explaining the terms of the lease

Even a solution to an economic dispute can become a breeding ground for threats! For example, the consideration of one of the cases, during which the plaintiff asked to explain to him certain clauses of the land plot lease agreement, ended with the tenant dissatisfied with the court decision not in his favor, took it as a personal insult and promised the judge that he would answer for it!

The judge first suggested to the plaintiff to challenge the decision on appeal court, and then, wishing to clarify the situation, asked the plaintiff if he was threatening him.

The plaintiff replied that when he threatens, people understand this from the first word, and in this case he simply warns that the judge will regret the decision.

What caused the situation?

The entrepreneur went to court with a clarifying claim, in which he asked to interpret the terms of the lease agreement for the land plot, which he rented from the local council.

The plaintiff was interested in specific articles on which, in his opinion, he and the landlord did not have the same understanding of their content.

He believed that these conditions contradict each other and are not consistent with the provisions of the law, therefore, are the reason for the dispute.

“The plaintiff asked for clarification of the provisions allowing him to revise the size and amount of rent without amending the contract before its expiration. He “got hooked” on the term “revise”, which, in his opinion, supported by the Academic Explanatory Dictionary, can be interpreted in different ways when drafting contracts.

In this case, the plaintiff also referred to the legislative procedure for revising the rent, according to which changes are made after the agreement of the parties and are fixed in writing, and not carried out automatically.

The case was considered for a long time! The plaintiff also sought an interpretation of the terms of the prolongation, additional agreements, touched upon the settled disputes on the debt, etc.

The outcome of the “dispute in regards revision ” consideration!

The court, having analyzed all the circumstances, did not find any formulations that were incomprehensible and complicating the fulfillment of the contractual obligations by the plaintiff in the lease agreement.

It was decided that the plaintiff, at the time of signing the contract, understood its terms and did not need to interpret them. In satisfaction of the claims, he was refused.

04.12.2019

10

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
One of the reasons for non-execution of court decisions of the Russian Federation in Ukraine

So, in the analyzed case No. 334/5077/19, the Ukrainian court considered the person’s petition for recognition and granting permission to execute the decision of the court of Tula, adopted in 2018, on the territory of our country. The sanction was required to collect funds from the defendant (international debt collection). The Ukrainian court notified the […]

The granddaughter whiсh is registered in the grandmother’s house, for donation is not an obstacle!

The grandmother in court proved her right to donate housing, despite the fact that her little granddaughter was registered in it! The Supreme court, by its conclusion in case No. 385/1598/18, determined that she is not a parent and not the one who replaces him, therefore, she is free in the right of alienation! Here […]

Have you built a house? Putting it into operation correctly!

The authorities continue to make sure that citizens provide themselves with housing! Not so long ago, the Ministry of Regional Development explained the nuances of a simplified procedure for the construction of a residential building, and now a detailed procedure for putting private houses into operation has appeared on the official website. Analyzing the process! […]

Forge a document and not go to jail? Is it real?

Interestingly the judges are judging! There is no other way to say after analyzing case No. 750/5469 / 18, which reached the Supreme Court and ended with the publication of a legal conclusion on it on 03.03.2021. In the beginning there was an acquittal … The District Court concluded that the citizen was innocent of […]

CCU: it is also impossible to fire a contract worker on vacation

The CCU, by its decision on the constitutional complaint in case No. 6-r(II)/2019 of 09/04/2019, categorically “forbade” employers to fire their employees who are on vacation or do not work due to temporary disability! At the same time, the KSU noted that the situation absolutely cannot be influenced by the fact that the labor relations […]

Civil marriage: showdown because of the apartment bought in it

Family showdown is an eternal topic! Even the array of family legislation and court practice accumulated over decades does not contain answers to all questions regarding family relations! The Supreme Court once again had to figure out whether or not the testimonies of witnesses certified by a notary are considered legal confirmation of a civil […]

lacomics.org