Submit your application

The granddaughter whiсh is registered in the grandmother’s house, for donation is not an obstacle!

The grandmother in court proved her right to donate housing, despite the fact that her little granddaughter was registered in it! The Supreme court, by its conclusion in case No. 385/1598/18, determined that she is not a parent and not the one who replaces him, therefore, she is free in the right of alienation!

Here is how it was!

Her mother appealed to the court in the interests of her young daughter. She demanded recognition of the contract of donation of housing in which she and her daughter are registered and live. The home was donated by the grandmother of her daughter’s granddaughter (the plaintiff’s aunt).

The first instance court satisfied the claim. The appeal upheld the said decision. The donation was declared invalid, since it was realized without the approval of the guardianship authorities, therefore, it violated the rights of the child.

Family showdowns have continued in the Supreme Court !

Grandmother was not so simple. She went to defend her right to alienate her property in the Supreme Court.

In the cassation appeal, she stated that she was not a mother to her granddaughter, and the fact that the baby was registered and lived in her house did not oblige her to support and provide for the girl!

Regarding the claims of the plaintiff, the grandmother pointed out to the court that the latter had no property rights to the house, therefore, there were no grounds to claim anything, including for the child.

The child has the right to use housing, but the fact of registration does not at all give rise to property rights!

“It is obvious that the grandmother did not need permission from the guardianship and guardianship authorities for the alienation of housing. Finally, it was approved in this right by the Supreme Court by a resolution on case No. 385/1598/18 dated 02/10/2021. The main argument in this decision was the fact that the grandmother to her granddaughter is not a mother, not a father, and not a person replacing parents.

It would be different if …

The grandmother adopted the granddaughter or would have been her: guardian, curator, foster caregiver, foster mother, parent-educator of an orphanage, actual educator of an orphan child or a child deprived of parental care.

All these statuses, giving rise to responsibilities in relation to the child, are established and regulated by the Family Code, but the grandmother in the described case did not possess any of them.

We draw conclusions!

The law was on the side of granny! The Supreme Court established that their colleagues from previous instances were wrong and the donation agreement was recognized as valid!

Apparently, grandmother had a good lawyer who did not stop the family dispute, but he literally saved the valuable real estate in our times.

Obviously, the services of a family lawyer are essential to deal with such situations.

After all, the will of chance (in the described situation – the will of the judges), could be completely unfair and the one who has the right to gift could be deprived of it. 



Ukrainian Supreme Court on proving the fact that the apartment was flooded by neighbors

The legal conclusion of the CCC of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in case No. 686/11256/16-c, published on December 27, 2019, is urgent legal assistance in the form of information for citizens-residents of high-rise buildings who were flooded or if they did it. Background to the proceedings! The owner of an apartment flooded by neighbors […]

You need to pay for heat, even if it is turned off in the apartment

Is the unauthorized disconnection of the apartment from the heating network a basis for canceling charges for heat? The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a decision on case No. 522/401/15-c of 25/09/19, answered the question in the negative. The consumer is obliged to pay for the service that has not been consumed anyway! Analyzing – […]

Personal mortgage property of a bankrupt entrepreneur: is it subject to collection?

Cassation economic court of the Supreme Court “stood up” for the mortgage apartment of the borrower of the bank, delimiting the personal and business rights and obligations of individual entrepreneurs, as well as limiting the rights of claimants to this property. So, with the conclusion in case No. 922/4404/15, promulgated on 06/04/19, the Supreme Court […]

CCU: it is also impossible to fire a contract worker on vacation

The CCU, by its decision on the constitutional complaint in case No. 6-r(II)/2019 of 09/04/2019, categorically “forbade” employers to fire their employees who are on vacation or do not work due to temporary disability! At the same time, the KSU noted that the situation absolutely cannot be influenced by the fact that the labor relations […]

Statute of limitation expiration – grounds for termination of the mortgage?

The Ukrainian Supreme Court published a legal conclusion governing the aspects of termination of obligations and mortgages due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Analyzing! Prehistory of the withdrawal in case No. 522/12443/17-c from 22.01.2020 Consideration was given to a claim to invalidate an apartment sale and purchase agreement, a counterclaim to remove […]

Ukrainian courts are cutting lawyer fees to the maximum

Every self-respecting judge considers it his duty to reduce the lawyer’s fee as much as possible. This “phenomenon” is especially painful for lawyers working on an hourly basis. Why is that? God only knows! God knows, but for human rights defenders – absolutely incomprehensible, because the law and practice of the Armed Forces of Ukraine […]