Let’s just say that the decision of the Dnieper Court of Appeal in case 199/6247/20 dated 16/06/2021 is not an unprecedented case, but deserves attention, since …
In Ukraine now there is no established judicial practice regarding compensation for moral damage caused by illegal actions of law enforcement agencies.
There are lonely court decisions, one of which we are analyzing.
This court satisfied claim with demand on MILLION for compensation for moral harm to citizens who suffered from the rude behavior of the guards – police officers who conducted a UNFUSED search.
The husband and wife went to court with a demand to recover material and moral damage.
In the statement of claim, they indicated that law enforcement officers rudely burst into their apartment under the pretext of a search at 7:00 am. They broke into the gate and the front door, destroying the cameras along the way, not trying to enter peacefully at all.
Without showing their IDs and a court order for a search, they beat the applicant, who was washing in the bathroom at the time. After that, the naked applicant was “laid down” on the floor of the shower room and he layed there for almost an hour at gunpoint.
At this time, the police officers were searching for something in the courtyard of the house and in the dwelling itself.
The applicant was then allowed to get up and get dressed. They said that a search is planned in the premises, which will be carried out after the arrival of a representative of the Regional Bar Council, since the applicant himself is a lawyer.
The representative arrived closer to 9:00 and the search began, despite the fact that the applicant had stated that the search warrant had a different address. This house is registered in the name of his wife, who was absent at that moment. After her arrival and presentation of the original documents confirming the ownership, a protocol was drawn up stating that the investigation team had come to the wrong address …
The object of the search was the applicant’s neighbor, who is also a lawyer.
What can you say here?
It is logical that the victim wrote a statement to the police. His and the conclusion of the forensic medical examination, he attached to the statement of claim in court as evidence of what had happened.
The victim, in a statement to the court, indicated that what had happened was mockery and torture.
The defendant, represented by the HO NP of Ukraine, naturally did not recognize the claim!
The court of first instance and the appeal satisfied the claim.
The following conclusions were made:
It would seem that this is one of the few court decisions that gives hope that the impunity of the law enforcement system may come to an end someday, but …
On September 20, 2021, the decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine entered into force in the case 199/6247/20 (proceedings 61-11686ck21), which “suspended the execution of the decision in the case”.
Why? Despite the fact that the unlawfulness of the search and all its consequences in the plaintiff’s house was established by the court, was his suffering left without compensation?
It’s that simple! The Main Treasury Service of Ukraine appealed to the Supreme Court, demanding the cancellation of the payment of UAH 1,000,000, as this could cause irreparable damage to the state budget!
P.S. Use the service “Defense of a lawyer during a search and seizure” from Law firm Speaker, even if you are a lawyer yourself, and go to the shower without fear.
The grandmother in court proved her right to donate housing, despite the fact that her little granddaughter was registered in it! The Supreme court, by its conclusion in case No. 385/1598/18, determined that she is not a parent and not the one who replaces him, therefore, she is free in the right of alienation! Here […]
“For the extra money issued by the ATM, the client is not responsible if there is no proof of receipt of funds!” – the Civil Court of Cassation expressed its decision in case No. 296/3921/15-c. The situation is in detail! A PrivatBank client withdraws a certain amount of money from a credit card at a […]
The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its decision in case 308/4390/18 of 16.12.19, determined the aspects of deviation from the principle of equality of shares in the division of jointly acquired property of spouses. The fact of the presence of children living with the father (on his full support) and the mother, who does not […]
On 11.09.19, the Supreme Court of Ukraine considered case No. 554/10202/13-c, in which the heir – the son from the first marriage of the deceased homeowner tried to defend his father’s apartment, sold by his second wife during her husband’s life and by his power of attorney to her own son. He insisted that there […]
As practice shows, counterparties, when concluding international agreements (if lawyers are not involved in the development of agreements), practically do not attach importance to the jurisdiction of dispute resolution. Obviously in vain! The information will be interesting and useful to foreign creditors who have debtors from Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. IN MOST CASES! Such “inattention” […]
The Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine has shown to citizens that the “inviolable” state, according to the conviction of many, can also be brought to justice! With the conclusion contained in the ruling on case No. 823/782/16 of 15.08.19, the CAC of the Supreme Court “punished” the state body for improper consideration […]
Entrust the settlement of legal disputes to the SPEAKER team of professionals! Get the highest level of legal services.
Мы готовы приступить к обсуждению Вашей задачи. Вскоре с Вами свяжемся.Back