Submit your application

Supreme Court of Ukraine on invalidation of the terminated agreement

Departure from existing legal positions by replacing them with new conclusions in the formation of law enforcement practice by the Supreme Court of Ukraine is a standard procedure!

Thus, on November 27, 2019, the BC-SCU published a legal opinion in case No. 905/1227/17, by which it departed from the 2015 conclusion in case No. 918/144/15.

The conclusion established the impossibility of recognizing the invalidity of the already terminated lease agreement, under which the property was returned, due to the termination of the existence of the subject of the dispute.

In a new resolution, the Supreme Court of Ukraine outlined the following considerations regarding the invalidation of a transaction after the termination of a lease agreement:

1. So, the economic and civil legislation does not contain provisions prohibiting the parties to apply to the court with a claim to invalidate a partially/fully executed or terminated contract.
2. In the analyzed case, the prosecutor’s office demanded that the lease agreement, which regulated the leasing of non-residential premises by a state educational institution to one company, be declared invalid for the future.
3. Part 4 of Art. The 61st Law of Ukraine “On Education” (as amended at the time of the conclusion of the agreement) allows educational institutions to use the property they manage as a financing instrument, in particular, by making a profit from renting it out.

“But … This “profitable business” is limited by law to certain requirements! In particular, temporarily unused premises can be rented out, which will be used for processes related to educational programs, provided that this does not worsen the social / living conditions of students and employees of the educational institution.

In this case, the contract was executed, but this circumstance did not deprive the party (in this case, the prosecutor’s office that protects interests in court) of the right to subsequently file a claim with the court in order to recognize its invalidity.

The legislation does not provide for the possibility of recognizing the invalidity of the transaction “for the future” (as the appeal court decided). The contract is considered invalid from the moment the relevant court decision enters into force.

In this case, the dissenting opinion of several judges was also expressed, who considered that there were no grounds for deviating from the legal position!

In their opinion, the absence of the subject of the dispute automatically makes the disputed material legal relationship absent, and the case could have been completed not by a court decision, but by termination of the proceedings due to the impossibility of a trial due to the circumstances revealed after the opening of the proceedings.



Bar reform has slowed down, lawyers are trying to speed it up

The reform of the legal profession has been delayed! According to the Ukrainian human rights community, the failure to adopt draft law No. 9055 “On the Bar and Lawyer Activities”, which should bring the activities of lawyers into line with the significantly changed procedural legislation, threatens the independence of the constitutional institution of the bar […]

Ban on travel abroad: aspects of imposition and removal!

CPCU prohibits debtors from leaving the country! This means that when trying to go abroad, an individual may suddenly find out that it is he who is prohibited from doing this, since this restrictive measure has been applied to him, established as an enforcement of the court decision. “Surprise”! Debt payment does not automatically open […]

Successful litigation strategy of protection in case of drink driving

Professional legal aid often ensures successful appeals against the decision of the first instance court. See for yourself how events can develop with one fresh example. The pensioner, a disabled person of the III group, was threatened with a fine in the amount of UAH 10 200.00 and deprivation of a driver’s license for a […]

The plaintiff threatened the judge for not explaining the terms of the lease

Even a solution to an economic dispute can become a breeding ground for threats! For example, the consideration of one of the cases, during which the plaintiff asked to explain to him certain clauses of the land plot lease agreement, ended with the tenant dissatisfied with the court decision not in his favor, took it […]

To Guarantors! Artificial insolvency is impossible!

A case won in court does not mean that the lender will automatically receive what the borrower owes him! One of the “worked out” schemes among the bank’s borrowers is that they alienate property at the stage of judicial review or during the period when the court decision comes into force. The main thing in […]

Conclusion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the impossibility of forced eviction

As a general rule of law, the owner has the right to evict from his residential property a person who lives there without sufficient grounds, but … By itself, the existence of ownership does not always automatically provide the owner with the opportunity to evict (discharge from the apartment or from the house) the one […]