En
Submit your application

SCU on the validity of the contract after the replacement of the 1st page in it

The impossibility of establishing certain circumstances does not relieve the participants in the process from the need to prove them! This conclusion was made public by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25.09.19 following the results of the proceedings in case No. 397/928/16-c.

The reason for the dispute was the replacement of the first page in the agreement by one of the parties to the transaction without agreeing this moment with the other party!

The original page contained the entry “the agreement was concluded for 10 years and ends on 03.12.2017”, and in the new edition it was written “the agreement was concluded for 10 years starting from the date of its registration”.

Brief overview of the circumstances of the dispute

The plaintiff filed a claim with the court to recognize the lease agreement as invalid, justifying his claim as follows:

  1. Between him and the defendant, a land lease agreement was previously concluded, by which the land plot was leased for 10 years.
  2. The defendant did not provide the plaintiff with a copy of the contract, and in the last year of its validity the plaintiff learned about the fact of the replacement of the first page.

“The court of first instance satisfied the claim – the contract was declared invalid, the appellate instance agreed with this! The defendant, on the other hand, appealed to the Supreme Court of Ukraine, stating that the plaintiff’s rights were not violated, since the first (new) page of the agreement complies with the legislation regarding the start of the ten-year term of the land plot lease”.

SCU figured out the case

The following was found:

  1. The defendant, after signing the controversial agreement before its registration, really changed its first page without notifying and coordinating this action with the counterparty.
  2. There is no “old” first page, and both parties declared its absence in court, which makes it impossible to establish what kind of content was recorded on this page.

Despite the fact that such circumstances clearly indicate the fact of violation of the rights of one of the parties to the transaction, its invalidity by the courts of previous instances was erroneously recognized, since it was based on assumptions.

The plaintiff accused the defendant, but could not argue, since he did not provide adequate evidence indicating which version of the contract he signed. By itself, the replacement of the page cannot unconditionally indicate a change in the terms of the contract.

In this situation, a legal examination of the contract was necessary. The impossibility of conducting it to compare the old and new pages makes it impossible to satisfy the claim for the recognition of the contract as invalid. Therefore, the contract remains valid!

18.12.2019

8

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
A decent pension is not an obstacle to claiming alimony

The duty of children to support their parents who need help is established by law! If the children do not fulfill it voluntarily, then the parents have the right to demand alimony through the court, and such family cases are always difficult, the court practice on them is constantly changing and supplemented, and it is […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine explained how to recover moral damage from the state

The Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine has shown to citizens that the “inviolable” state, according to the conviction of many, can also be brought to justice! With the conclusion contained in the ruling on case No. 823/782/16 of 15.08.19, the CAC of the Supreme Court “punished” the state body for improper consideration […]

Have you built a house? Putting it into operation correctly!

The authorities continue to make sure that citizens provide themselves with housing! Not so long ago, the Ministry of Regional Development explained the nuances of a simplified procedure for the construction of a residential building, and now a detailed procedure for putting private houses into operation has appeared on the official website. Analyzing the process! […]

Contractual obligations and installment of court decision

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its legal opinion in case No. 916/190/18 of 06/04/19, answered the question, does the installment plan for the execution of the judgment terminate the contractual obligation? According to the published conclusion, the installment plan, in fact, only affects the procedure for the enforcement of the […]

Had delayed paying severance pay? Pay the fine!

The first thing every citizen leaving his old place of work thinks about is how much money will fall on the card as a severance pay. Naturally, he wants more and that’s okay! The employer who signs the dismissal order is thinking about how to pay less! And he can be understood too! But, the […]

One aspect of resolving disputes over land use rights

Disputed land under the construction is a potential litigation with all the ensuing consequences. The Supreme Court of Ukraine considered one of such disputes and published a legal opinion, which determines that the granting of permission for the development of a land management project regarding the allotment of a “non-free” land plot does not give […]

lacomics.org