Again, about the legalization of a foreign court decision in Ukraine. Today – about one of the problems that are systematically faced by companies of Poland who have sold a product or provided a service to a Ukrainian company.
The information will be useful to those who have already encountered a problem and will be informatively interesting for those who are planning to cooperate with Ukrainian companies. Knowledge will help the latter not to make the mistake of many …
A Polish client signs a contract with a Ukrainian partner. The document provides for the jurisdiction of the dispute resolution in court at the location of the seller, that is, in Poland.
The counterparty violates the contract, a debt arises. The pre-trial settlement of the problem does not give a result. A Pole goes to a Polish court and receives a “zaoczny wyrok” from a court under a simplified procedure.
Then he needs to legalize this decision on the territory of Ukraine in order to submit it for compulsory execution. At this stage, the fun begins!!!
“Absentee court decisions” are accepted without notifying the defendant about the court session and without summoning him to it, and the procedure for legalizing such a “decision” in Ukraine provides for the submission to the court of a document confirming the notice of the defendant about the court hearing. This point is regulated by Art. 466 of the Code of Civil Procedure, establishing the requirements for an application for permission to enforce a court decision from another country”.
Article 466 of the CPCU establishes that if international treaties, the consent to which is provided by the Supreme Council, does not define the list of documentation that should be attached to the application, or there is no such agreement, the following documents should be attached to it:
Importantly! The court leaves the application without consideration and returns it, together with the documentation, to the person who submitted it, if:
Article 51 of the Treaty between Ukraine and the Republic of Poland “On Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil and Criminal Cases” establishes that an application for recognition and enforcement of a decision can be submitted directly to the appropriate court of that Contracting Party in whose territory this decision is to be recognized and enforced , or also through the court that considered the case initially.
It seems that there are legal norms regulating this problematic situation! In practice, the legalization of the decision of the Polish court in Ukraine in this situation is practically impossible, since the clients do not have in their hands evidence of notifying the defendants. This point is not spelled out by law, therefore, it is not mandatory.
It turns out that the decision of the Polish court that has entered into force is absolutely unviable for collecting debt abroad, since Polish lawyers, when drawing up contracts, do not take into account the requirements of an international agreement with the country in which the debtor is locating.
For a Ukrainian debtor, the such situation is a wonderful opportunity to legally avoid paying bills or fulfilling obligations.
When concluding foreign economic contracts, Polish clients should engage lawyers who are competent in international debt collection before signing the contracts. Lawyers who are really experienced in this matter will immediately point out this and other weak points!
If the contract is signed and the case has gone to court, then before filing a claim, you should also talk to a lawyer practicing foreclosure, who will provide legal proceedings, taking into account the analyzed nuance.
The case № 638/8636/17-c considered by the Supreme Court, 05/13/2020, was closed by a legal conclusion, according to which the inactivity of the prosecutor’s office is not evidence of moral harm, therefore, it cannot be compensated! Initially, the lawsuit was initiated by a citizen who believes that the inaction of the law enforcement system is […]
The grandmother in court proved her right to donate housing, despite the fact that her little granddaughter was registered in it! The Supreme court, by its conclusion in case No. 385/1598/18, determined that she is not a parent and not the one who replaces him, therefore, she is free in the right of alienation! Here […]
“On claims for foreclosure on the subject of a mortgage, the court fee is calculated based on the value of the pledged property, and not on the amount of the debt obligation!” – expressed the Supreme Court of Ukraine by the decision on the case No. 307/23/18 dated 02.10.19. The conclusion was made after considering […]
A case won in court does not mean that the lender will automatically receive what the borrower owes him! One of the “worked out” schemes among the bank’s borrowers is that they alienate property at the stage of judicial review or during the period when the court decision comes into force. The main thing in […]
Any protection of interests in court is a procedure limited by the terms prescribed by law! How long any dispute can be considered in court depends on the specific circumstances of each individual situation. Ukrainian legislation “allows” litigation to last for years, and the European Court from time to time tries to suppress this pattern, […]
The CCU, by its decision on the constitutional complaint in case No. 6-r(II)/2019 of 09/04/2019, categorically “forbade” employers to fire their employees who are on vacation or do not work due to temporary disability! At the same time, the KSU noted that the situation absolutely cannot be influenced by the fact that the labor relations […]
Entrust the settlement of legal disputes to the SPEAKER team of professionals! Get the highest level of legal services.
Мы готовы приступить к обсуждению Вашей задачи. Вскоре с Вами свяжемся.Back