En
Submit your application

Legal conclusion governing the donation of a share in a joint-stock company

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its decision in case No. 909/1294/15 of 01.10.19, “annulled” the conclusion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in case No. 33/45-09-1388 of 22.12.09, with the help of which the courts considered disputes on the donation of shares in these most societies to each other.

Donating shares in a new way!

The assignment of a share in the authorized capital of a company is not considered an independent, unnamed contract, since it is realized by concluding a donation, sale and purchase agreement, exchange, etc.

In the position canceled by the Grand Chamber, it was said that the law allows the owner of a share to choose the method of assigning his share to other participants and he has the right to do this by concluding any agreement or in another way.

The new conclusion is based on the fact that the assignment of a share is alienation!

Regulates its nuances Art. 147 of the Civil Code and Art. 53 of the Law of Ukraine “On economic societies”. Alienation in its legal essence requires the expression of the will of the parties – alienating and receiving. Their transaction is fixed by an agreement, which, in turn, is concluded orally or in writing, depending on the requirements of the legislation and the charter of the company.

In accordance with the requirements of Articles 717 and 719 of the Civil Code, for the free alienation of a share, it is imperative to draw up a donation agreement in writing. Its legitimacy will be observed under the conditions:

  • that a corresponding application will be submitted to the name of the company;
  • the statement will be recorded in the minutes of the general meeting;
  • the application and the protocol will be signed by the donor and the donee;
  • both of these documents will stipulate the “gratuitousness” of the transfer.

Why the question arose!

A case in which one of the LLC participants challenged the donation of his share in the society, which he allegedly left voluntarily, was transfered by the GC-SCU.

In the course of the proceedings, it was found out that “according to the documents”, the applicant voluntarily left the membership of the LLC, leaving by donating 100% of his shares to another participant. The documents were under examination, which found them to be forged, but the courts of previous instances rejected the expert conclusions …

It is worth noting that the share price was over UAH 100 million!

Could this be the reason that the courts of previous instances gave an inappropriate legal assessment of the circumstances of the case, incorrectly applied the legislation and, as a result, ruled against the plaintiff?

Fortunately for the latter, he was helped to defend justice by a professional lawyer in commercial disputes, who achieved that the dispute was resolved according to the law, and the Supreme Court of Ukraine, thanks to this, formed a new legal position that more carefully regulates the issues of donating shares in joint-stock companies.

14.11.2019

136

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Conclusion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the impossibility of forced eviction

As a general rule of law, the owner has the right to evict from his residential property a person who lives there without sufficient grounds, but … By itself, the existence of ownership does not always automatically provide the owner with the opportunity to evict (discharge from the apartment or from the house) the one […]

The new owner is not entitled to evict the debtor from mortgage housing

The Supreme Court of Ukraine considered the case on the eviction of the former owner (debtor of the bank) from the apartment purchased (by the new owner). A relevant legal conclusion has been published, informative for real estate buyers and bank borrowers. Thus, a new non-owner who has bought “risky” real estate from a mortgagee […]

BC-Supreme Court of Ukraine “forbade” Privat to collect % and fines on credit cards

By its decision in case No. 342/180/17 of 03/07/19, the BC-Supreme Court of Ukraine “broke” the established judicial practice on the collection of overdue debt on PrivatBank credit cards! From this date, the terms and conditions for the provision of banking services posted on the pages of the PrivatBank website: Are not considered a public […]

Enforcement of arbitration awards in the Russian Federation – we collect debts from legal entities. Theory and practice

Foreword! Collection of overdue debts from legal entities is a multi-stage and multi-variant procedure. Consider all the stages and options step by step. The material is divided into separate blocks so that everyone who reads it can easily get acquainted with exactly what he needs (at the same time, it is not forbidden to interrupt […]

Execution of one of the decisions of the Supreme Court of California in Ukraine

Marriages are made in heaven, and are finished, in most cases, in the courts. Trite, but true. It is easier if the spouses are citizens of the same country in which they live. Everything becomes more complicated if the decision to end the marriage relationship is made abroad, and the spouses are citizens of different […]

SCU has figured out the nuances of applying measures to secure a claim

The owner cannot be limited in the right to use his property due to the existence of a claim for the recognition of the lease agreement regarding this property as invalid! This decision was made by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on November 21, 2018 following the results of the proceedings in case No. 752/6255/18. […]