The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its decision in case No. 909/1294/15 of 01.10.19, “annulled” the conclusion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in case No. 33/45-09-1388 of 22.12.09, with the help of which the courts considered disputes on the donation of shares in these most societies to each other.
The assignment of a share in the authorized capital of a company is not considered an independent, unnamed contract, since it is realized by concluding a donation, sale and purchase agreement, exchange, etc.
In the position canceled by the Grand Chamber, it was said that the law allows the owner of a share to choose the method of assigning his share to other participants and he has the right to do this by concluding any agreement or in another way.
The new conclusion is based on the fact that the assignment of a share is alienation!
Regulates its nuances Art. 147 of the Civil Code and Art. 53 of the Law of Ukraine “On economic societies”. Alienation in its legal essence requires the expression of the will of the parties – alienating and receiving. Their transaction is fixed by an agreement, which, in turn, is concluded orally or in writing, depending on the requirements of the legislation and the charter of the company.
In accordance with the requirements of Articles 717 and 719 of the Civil Code, for the free alienation of a share, it is imperative to draw up a donation agreement in writing. Its legitimacy will be observed under the conditions:
A case in which one of the LLC participants challenged the donation of his share in the society, which he allegedly left voluntarily, was transfered by the GC-SCU.
In the course of the proceedings, it was found out that “according to the documents”, the applicant voluntarily left the membership of the LLC, leaving by donating 100% of his shares to another participant. The documents were under examination, which found them to be forged, but the courts of previous instances rejected the expert conclusions …
It is worth noting that the share price was over UAH 100 million!
Could this be the reason that the courts of previous instances gave an inappropriate legal assessment of the circumstances of the case, incorrectly applied the legislation and, as a result, ruled against the plaintiff?
Fortunately for the latter, he was helped to defend justice by a professional lawyer in commercial disputes, who achieved that the dispute was resolved according to the law, and the Supreme Court of Ukraine, thanks to this, formed a new legal position that more carefully regulates the issues of donating shares in joint-stock companies.
Professional legal aid often ensures successful appeals against the decision of the first instance court. See for yourself how events can develop with one fresh example. The pensioner, a disabled person of the III group, was threatened with a fine in the amount of UAH 10 200.00 and deprivation of a driver’s license for a […]
Is the unauthorized disconnection of the apartment from the heating network a basis for canceling charges for heat? The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a decision on case No. 522/401/15-c of 25/09/19, answered the question in the negative. The consumer is obliged to pay for the service that has not been consumed anyway! Analyzing – […]
Family showdown is an eternal topic! Even the array of family legislation and court practice accumulated over decades does not contain answers to all questions regarding family relations! The Supreme Court once again had to figure out whether or not the testimonies of witnesses certified by a notary are considered legal confirmation of a civil […]
By its decision in case No. 465/7083/13-c of 10.07.19, the Supreme Court of Ukraine provided a kind of housing legal advice, answering the question whether the fact that minors did not living in an apartment in itself was an unconditional justification for their loss of the right to use the living space. The question arose […]
Interestingly the judges are judging! There is no other way to say after analyzing case No. 750/5469 / 18, which reached the Supreme Court and ended with the publication of a legal conclusion on it on 03.03.2021. In the beginning there was an acquittal … The District Court concluded that the citizen was innocent of […]
So, in the analyzed case No. 334/5077/19, the Ukrainian court considered the person’s petition for recognition and granting permission to execute the decision of the court of Tula, adopted in 2018, on the territory of our country. The sanction was required to collect funds from the defendant (international debt collection). The Ukrainian court notified the […]
Entrust the settlement of legal disputes to the SPEAKER team of professionals! Get the highest level of legal services.
Мы готовы приступить к обсуждению Вашей задачи. Вскоре с Вами свяжемся.Back