Submit your application

Damage from “worker’s injury” is a reason not to pay court fees!

The Ukrainian Supreme Court spoke about the obligation to pay legal costs in cases of compensation by persons who suffered material damage as a result of injury at work.

By the decision in case No. 127/20705 / 16-c of 06/11/2019, the Supreme Court “freed” such persons from paying the court fee!

Background of conclusion and essence of requirements

The postman applied to the court with a claim against the employer – “Ukrposhta”. She wanted to receive compensation for the injury – compensation for material damage.

While on duty – delivering mail, she fell and suffered an industrial injury – fractures in several places. She was treated for more than 7 months. Despite this, she was not given a disability group. MSEK recorded her 25% loss of working capacity.

The victim paid for all treatment at her own expense. The Social Insurance Fund reimbursed her UAH 300. To plaintiff, in order for the injured hand to work, had to undergo an operation in a foreign clinic.

She went to court with the requirement to collect compensation from the employer in the form of a one-time payment of UAH 500,000. and a monthly lifetime compensation of 3 times the minimum wage.

“The court dismissed the applicant’s claims, referring to the lack of evidence. The appeal did not even consider the claim – she returned the application and declared it not filed on the grounds of Part 2 of Art. 297 CPCU – due to non-payment of the court fee”.

The plaintiff appealed to the Ukrainian Supreme Court. She pointed out that persons who have suffered material damage as a result of injury related to production, confirmed by the relevant act of the commission, are exempted from paying court fees on the basis of paragraph 2 of part 1 of Art. 5 Law of Ukraine “On court fee”.

Conclusions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on this case

According to the law, “unpaid” appeals are not considered by the court – they remain without movement. The refusal must be legally justified.

The refusal in this claim was motivated by the fact that the claim was filed against the state-owned enterprise for compensation for material damage due to an accident, therefore, the rule of clause 2 p. 1 tbsp. 5 of the Law of Ukraine “On court fee” is not applied, but this is an erroneous conclusion, since …

According to clause 2 of part 1 of article 5 of the Law of Ukraine “On court fee”, plaintiffs are exempted from paying court fees in all courts – in cases of compensation for harm caused by death, injury or other damage to health.

In case No. 127/20705/16-c of 11/06/2019, the citizen asked for the recovery of material damage from the employer precisely because of the injury that arose in the performance of labor duties.

Consequently, the conclusions of the appeal are incorrect, the case is subject to examination and must be considered.

The conclusion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in this situation is legal assistance that allows citizens to reach victory “in the war for compensation for damage from the employer”, and not be left crippled with 300 UAH from Social Insurance.



On “saving” confiscated housing by donating it to relatives

One of the “working” options for “saving” real estate from confiscation / foreclosure to pay off debts, the people have always considered the option of donating it to relatives through drawing up a donation agreement, the fictitiousness of which is quite difficult to dispute. Difficult, but possible! The Supreme Court of Ukraine published another legal […]

Ban on travel abroad: aspects of imposition and removal!

CPCU prohibits debtors from leaving the country! This means that when trying to go abroad, an individual may suddenly find out that it is he who is prohibited from doing this, since this restrictive measure has been applied to him, established as an enforcement of the court decision. “Surprise”! Debt payment does not automatically open […]

Can spouses divide an unauthorized built house in case of divorce?

They wanted to save money, but it turned out the other way around. The couple built a house in which they planned to live happily ever after, but the family union fell apart … In court, the question arose of how to divide the house, which, as it turned out, cannot be divided due to […]

A raider in a court gown and with a “crust” of a lawyer, nonsense? Not at all!

Judges, lawyers and justice officials love money too! Sometimes they use their connections and powers to improve their financial well-being! Some find themselves a lucrative “hobby”, for example, they are engaged in raiding. SBU officers uncovered a criminal scheme carried out by “raiders in court robes” with the help of lawyers and former employees of […]

The expert conclusion about the “probability of forgery” is not an argument

The Supreme Court of Ukraine got the case № 760/10691/18, during which the validity of the sale and purchase agreement was challenged, which, according to the plaintiff, was not signed by him! As a result of the proceedings, a legal opinion was published on 04.09.19! The Ukrainian Supreme Court determined that the expert’s conclusion that […]

The Supreme Court of Ukraine on the cancellation of the “old” will with a new one

The citizen applied to the court with a claim against two other persons, demanding the recognition of property rights by inheritance. The claim was motivated by the fact that after the death of her aunt, an inheritance for real estate (house, land) was opened. She, within the time period established by law, turned to the […]